Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Writing Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Posted: October 23rd, 2023

Ensuring Informed Consent Through Culturally Sensitive Communication

Case Study:Dr. Emily Clark, a seasoned cardiologist at Mercy General Hospital, is presented with a challenging case involving Mr. Rajan Patel, a 58-year-old man who recently immigrated from India. Mr. Patel has been diagnosed with a significant heart condition that requires a surgical procedure. While the surgery has a high success rate, like all medical procedures, it comes with its own set of risks and benefits. Mr. Patel, whose primary language is Gujarati, has limited proficiency in English. He nods and smiles politely during consultations, giving Dr. Clark the impression that he understands. However, when asked to explain the procedure back to her, it becomes evident that he does not fully grasp the intricacies of the surgery or its potential complications. Dr. Clark recognizes the importance of informed consent and wants to ensure that Mr. Patel truly understands the procedure, its risks, and its benefits. She believes in the ethical principle of autonomy, which dictates that every patient has the right to make decisions about their own body and health. However, she also acknowledges the principle of beneficence, which compels her to act in the best interest of her patient.

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:1. briefly summarize the facts surrounding the case study. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.

Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references.
Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

Ensuring Informed Consent Through Culturally Sensitive Communication

Medical ethics places great importance on respecting patient autonomy and obtaining informed consent for any procedure. However, effective communication can prove challenging when linguistic and cultural barriers exist between provider and patient. This paper will analyze an ethical dilemma faced by Dr. Emily Clark in ensuring her limited-English-proficient patient Mr. Rajan Patel comprehends the risks and benefits of a high-risk cardiac surgery to provide truly informed consent. Using an ethical decision-making framework and evidence from academic literature, culturally sensitive communication strategies will be proposed to resolve the dilemma respectfully.
Case Summary
Dr. Clark, a cardiologist, must obtain consent from Mr. Patel, a 58-year-old Indian immigrant, for surgery to treat a significant heart condition. While the procedure offers benefit, it also carries risk. As the primary language is Gujarati, Mr. Patel has limited English proficiency. During consultations he appears to understand through nodding, but clarification reveals gaps. Dr. Clark recognizes her duties of respecting patient autonomy through informed consent and acting in the patient’s best medical interests (beneficence). She must find an effective way to communicate that fulfills both responsibilities despite the language barrier.
Ethical Decision-Making Model
Bebeau et al.’s (1999) three-component model provides a framework for analyzing this dilemma. Through moral awareness, Dr. Clark recognizes informed consent is essential yet direct communication challenges exist due to limited English. For moral judgment, she acknowledges duties to both benefit the patient and respect his autonomy. Regarding ethical behavior, effective solutions balancing these duties must be determined.
Contributing Factors
Two key factors contribute to the communication challenges. First, as an immigrant, cultural differences may impact Mr. Patel’s perspective on medical decision-making (Ngo-Metzger et al., 2007). Second, and most directly inhibiting comprehension, is the language barrier preventing full understanding between provider and patient (Jacobs et al., 2016). These factors require culturally sensitive solutions respecting patient values and background.
Proposed Solutions
Research demonstrates qualified medical interpreters can successfully bridge linguistic divides to ensure patient understanding (Jacobs et al., 2016). Using an interpreter, Dr. Clark could review simplified consent materials step-by-step with Mr. Patel, checking comprehension at each point. This approach respects patient autonomy through informed consent while fulfilling her duty of beneficence by clarifying risks and benefits are understood.
Evidence shows simplified consent forms and visual aids also improve limited-English patients’ comprehension of medical procedures (Hoffman et al., 2016). Pictures, diagrams and easy-to-understand summaries of risks versus benefits can supplement interpretation services. By applying multiple evidence-based strategies simultaneously, the most effective solution balances ethical responsibilities.
This case highlights how health professionals must consider cultural and linguistic factors impacting patient understanding to make ethically sound decisions. Through moral awareness of consent duties and the specific barriers present, moral judgment balancing responsibilities to benefit and respect autonomy, and proposing the ethical behavior of using qualified interpreters and simplified materials, Dr. Clark can resolve the dilemma respectfully.
The proposed solution demonstrates respect for patient autonomy through fully informed consent while also fulfilling her duty of beneficence by ensuring risks and benefits are comprehended. By thoughtfully applying relevant ethical principles and evidence from academic literature, health professionals can effectively communicate across linguistic divides and feel confident ethical standards of practice are upheld.

In summary, this paper analyzed an ethical dilemma in obtaining informed consent from a limited-English patient requiring high-risk surgery. Using an ethical decision-making framework, contributing linguistic and cultural factors were identified. Evidence demonstrated qualified interpreters and simplified materials can successfully bridge communication barriers to respect patient autonomy through full comprehension, satisfying ethical responsibilities. This case highlights the importance of culturally sensitive communication in health care ethics.
Bebeau, M. J., Born, D. O., & Ozar, D. T. (1999). A new approach to assessing the ethical development of dental students. Journal of Dental Education, 63(8), 651–660. https://www.jdentaled.org/content/63/8/651
Hoffman, R. M., Tung, E. E., Han, D. P., & Li, C. (2016). Improving informed consent for cataract surgery through the use of a preoperative educational video. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 169, 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.024
Jacobs, E. A., Lauderdale, D. S., Meltzer, D., Shorey, J. M., Levinson, W., & Thisted, R. A. (2016). Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited-English-proficient patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(7), 468-474. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007468.x
Ngo-Metzger, Q., Massagli, M. P., Clarridge, B. R., Manocchia, M., Davis, R. B., Iezzoni, L. I., & Phillips, R. S. (2007). Linguistic and cultural barriers to care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(3), 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0313-4

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Homework Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-30% Off on Every Order!

Why choose us?

Every student wants the best grades and that’s our Focus

Top Essay Writers

We carefully choose the most exceptional writers to become part of our team, each with specialized knowledge in particular subject areas and a background in academic research writing.

Affordable Prices

Our service prioritizes recruiting the most talented writers at an affordable cost. We facilitate the lowest possible pricing without compromising the quality of our services. Our costs are student friendly and competitive in comparison to other writing services in the industry.

100% Plagiarism-Free

The service guarantees that our final work is 100% original and plagiarism-free, ensuring this through a thorough scan of every draft copy using advanced plagiarism detection software before releasing it to be delivered to our valued customers.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Nursing Assignment Answers, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and,the support and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.