Bellamy response paper final

The centrality of public life In the twentieth century of Bellary’s imagination, Nationalism, offers a response to rampant individualism. The unified nation led by a single capitalist cures labor crisis by completing the inevitable convergence of human industry. “The nation, that is to say, organized as the one great business corporation in which all other corporations were absorbed; it became the one capitalist in the place of all other capitalists, the sole employer, the final monopoly in which all previous and lesser monopolies were swallowed up, a monopoly in the profits and economies of which all tizzies shared.The epoch of trusts had ended in The Great Trust.

” (Page 76) The centrality of public life refers to the idea that the value in human relationships may be found in mutual cooperation, not individuality. Here, Bellary begins his work Of social critique, the purpose for which he constructs this utopia. The main targets of the criticism are a wasteful industrial system and the unequal distribution of wealth.

This twentieth- century Boston seems to have found a way to distribute wealth equally so that everyone is prosperous, and it has also found a way to produce wealth ore efficiently.The utopian Boston is a public space where people value the common good above individual desire. The capitalist society of the nineteenth century is indicted for both its waste and its cruelty. The image of huge carriage pulled by the struggling many and enjoyed by the privileged few begins the novel and provides a preview of the critique of the novel.

Instead of viewing people as having a basic right to sustenance, the capitalist market views people as labor power, deserving of sustenance only if they can support themselves. Doctor Elate points out that no one is self-supporting.The richest person wholly relies on others to live a life of wealth, just as a handicapped person relies on another person to get around in the city. Looking Backward condemns 19th-century industrial society as brutal and primitive compared to the egalitarian and peaceful society of the year 2000. Bellary condemns a competitive economic system as unjust, wasteful, and vicious. His novel is intended to illustrate that, without private property, there would no longer be social problems such as shortages, class divisions, joblessness, poor working conditions and long hours of working, child labor, tries, poverty, hunger, crime, and war.In his utopian society, there is no competition, no duplication of producers and distributors, no waste due to overproduction, no idle capital or labor, no political parties, and no cyclical crises.

In his vision of the United States in the year 2000, there exists total equality of income, universal public education, social welfare and healthcare systems from cradle to grave, and universal employment in an industrial army. Bellary envisioned his society in 2000 as perfect, and thus no additional social engineering was needed.Bellary pictured the transition to secure and happy utopia as taking place by natural stages from an economy dominated by capitalistic monopolies to one owned by the government. Unlike Marxist, Bellary did not see class war as an inevitable step in the transition from capitalism to socialism. His utopian socialism was to be reached through peaceful and gradual transition, not through violent proletarian revolution.